tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260510730184507282.post305252516789343713..comments2024-01-30T04:57:48.673-05:00Comments on Second Mile Sandusky Scandal: Corbett's Grand Jury Lie, Part 3Barry Bozemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03484041114078117845noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260510730184507282.post-17189341316762904762016-04-20T15:42:26.434-04:002016-04-20T15:42:26.434-04:00Ray - I suspect that part of the reason that Moult...Ray - I suspect that part of the reason that Moulton's report was so toothless was because of State Police Commissioner Frank Noonan's pushback. Noonan stated publicly that he wouldn't allow his officers to speak with Moulton. I wouldn't be surprised if he made private threats to withhold state police cooperation for other Attorney General cases. <br /><br />Too, Moulton had to be careful not to include details in the report that might aid Sandusky appeals or the defense of Curley, Schultz and Spanier. <br /><br />I believe Moulton saw plenty of evidence of police and prosecutor misconduct but he didn't want to get cast as a whistleblower, which would have hurt his own career. Tim Bertonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06534135581401662154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260510730184507282.post-88728297771365407452016-04-19T20:39:31.597-04:002016-04-19T20:39:31.597-04:00Truthseeker,
Early in this post I mentioned that A...Truthseeker,<br />Early in this post I mentioned that AG Kane made a mistake not to "clean house" when she took office. It appears at least one of the rotten apples of the AG's office was on Moulton's team and kept this information out of the report. <br /><br />This individual received other leads about child abuse related to the Sandusky case -- obtained vis-a-vis the Moulton investigation. It's clear that those leads were not investigated.Ray Bleharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14557326921056183979noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260510730184507282.post-65776444508297368712016-04-18T21:03:30.823-04:002016-04-18T21:03:30.823-04:00Tim,
Thanks for your comment.
You make a very goo...Tim,<br />Thanks for your comment.<br /><br />You make a very good point that the porn emails should have been included since they were being viewed during the active investigation.<br /><br />For one reason or another, the scope of the Moulton investigation went from "no stone unturned" to a very narrowly focused investigation that began on November 20, 2008 and ended with the second set of charges against Sandusky on December 7 and his subsequent bail out on December 8, 2011. <br /><br />My best guess as to why this was done was because Kane was already under fire regarding the Ali case and decided to hold and play those cards later.<br /><br />Both sides played politics with the Sandusky case and both got burned. It will be interesting to see who will emerge victorious, but my advice is to NOT bet against Kane.<br />Ray Bleharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14557326921056183979noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260510730184507282.post-12291426860128301942016-04-15T21:07:32.059-04:002016-04-15T21:07:32.059-04:00So I guess one logical question we should ask is, ...So I guess one logical question we should ask is, why didn't Geoff Moulton include in his report that Tom Corbett and Frank Noonan neglected to use arrest records to find and identify witnesses/victims? We can all see why Corbett and Noonan ignored the obvious. As you say Ray, they wanted the Sandusky case to die within their corrupt grand jury. So do we have no choice but to assume Geoff Moulton soft-shoed his report because he was "influenced" to do so? It does appear this PA Diocese, Second Mile, Sandusky, Arrow Ministries, Philadelphia, connection is growing as each new stone is found and turned over. And 'inexplicable' is a rather innocuous way to describe a very harmful lack of action to stop organized, institutional pedophilia. <br /><br />So was Kane's highly-touted investigator just another "Freeh", a gatekeeper of sorts? Louis Freeh seems to pop when big players are accused of child sex abuse. We now know he is anything but a child protection advocate. He is the opposite, a protector of the filthy, powerful abusers of our children. It makes me sick to think Louis Freeh was on the Board of Directors for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. God only knows how much abuse and murdering of children he helped to cover up. Just like he did in the Minot North Dakota child sex crimes investigation. And a letter from FBI agent, Jane Turner was sent to Rodney Erickson about Freeh's intentional botching of that investigation. She tried to warn President Erickson that Louis Freeh does not protect children from sex abuse. Rather, he protects the abusers. And Erickson hires Freeh anyway to find out who was part of the Sandusky's pedophile victim farm. I have to wonder if Kane was duped by Moulton and his 'inexplicable'. Yeah, inexplicable means a mystery. Just like D.A. Ray Gricar disappearing with no serious investigation on a national level--just a mystery. Nothing to see here folks, inexplicable, that's all, a mystery, forget about it. Truthseekerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06434780738644463324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260510730184507282.post-48575664479130087912016-04-15T12:13:25.502-04:002016-04-15T12:13:25.502-04:00"This was turning a blind eye to evidence and..."This was turning a blind eye to evidence and not conducting the most basic investigative work."<br /><br />I think that applies to both Corbett's Sandusky investigation as well as Moulton's report. The Moulton Report just ignored a lot of the damning evidence, including the porn emails. <br /><br /><br />Tim Bertonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06534135581401662154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260510730184507282.post-46834092236995088862016-04-15T07:44:08.202-04:002016-04-15T07:44:08.202-04:00So sad that these little men's vendettas are s...So sad that these little men's vendettas are still ruining people's lives and the reputation of a great university. Thanks, again, Ray. You do excellent work!bsharpe3https://www.blogger.com/profile/08009543089034767761noreply@blogger.com