|Outside the Harrisburg Office?|
Blowing the thinnest threads of email into a conspiracy the Lame Duck of Harrisburg is going out in a meteoric blaze that will likely be the flame out of her cornhusks preceding the crash of this latest craziness.
Typical LIES of the Old Prevarication now rehashed as the NEW PRESENTMENT from page 10 of the latest junk file from AG Linda Kelly:
See line two of the paragraph above "Curley anxiously asked Schultz for status updates on at least three occasions" like "anything new in this department"? or "any further update"? Wow is AG Kelly gifted with some kind of 6th sense? She can sense "anxiousness" in 13 year old type of an email message?
Kelly claims that the emails indicate a materially false statement when he said he no knowledge of this investigation or any recollection of his involvement. So lets look at the Grand Jury transcript.
Well what sexually inappropriate conduct was there in 1998? Kelly already mentioned the 1998 emails where Curley was told by Schultz that a DPW person was going to interview Jerry and that a psychologist was going to talk to the boy AND then he learned that NO charges would be filed because there was no criminal or sexually inappropriate behavior.
That's right you know. We've all seen these emails labeled Re: Jerry Here are those famous emails below
Note how anxiously Tim asks Gary - any updates?
Note the detailed information - "I understand a DPW person was here last week and they decided to have a child psychologist talk to the child and finally the real biggie - there was NO CRIMINAL behavior and the matter was closed.
Does this sound like some big time criminal investigation of sexually inappropriate activity to you?
I didn't think so - but such is the mind of LINDA KELLY who sees anxiousness in "any updates" and an allegations of sexually improper conduct in "I understand a DPW person was here and a child psychologist will talk to the child and Case Closed with NO CRIMINAL conduct.