Showing posts with label Gary Schultz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gary Schultz. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 29

VOTE AS IF THE REPUTATION OF YOUR ALMA MATER DEPENDS ON IT. IT DOES.

The upcoming election for Governor offers the opportunity to get the media to focus on the Truth because the Truth clearly shows Tom Corbett damaged Penn State university without regard for the Truth.  Popularly elected Alumni Trustees will have the power to make the Truth known so vote for the Trustee candidates who are willing to fight for the Truth.  

 by Barry Bozeman

 May 8, 2013 will mark the end of this year's Board of Trustees election. The turnout as of April 24 is just under 19,000 votes lagging behind 2012 and 2013 by 20 to 25%. As we have attempted to explain in several posts here on SMSS, the makeup of the BoT runs counter to the interests of Penn State University:

 In our view, Tom Corbett and those who are beholden to him, are in clear breach of their fiduciary duty to Penn State due to clear and compelling conflicts of interest. Their violations should constitute grounds for removal from the Board of Trustees. Corbett's desire to gut Commonwealth funding for Penn State is just one obvious example of his personal conflict with what is in the best interest of Penn State. His handling of the attack on Penn State and his part in the firing of Joe Paterno and the termination and indictment of Graham Spanier is even more obvious and repellent. We support a strong group of Trustees who will fight Corbett and bring these breaches of fiduciary duty to light in this election year. How can a Trustee bound by law to do what is in the best interest of Penn State be the architect of these attacks on Penn State and remain on the Board of Trustees ? 

Read more »
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, April 24

FEAR & LOATHING in HAPPY VALLEY - The BALDWIN DUPLICITY and The CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

CYNTHIA BALDWIN - Who is this Woman? 
And how can we explain or even understand her actions ?  

By all biographical and outward signs, Cynthia Baldwin is a major success story:

PSU BA in English 1966, MA in Amer. Lit 1974. Worked as a teacher, English professor and Asst. Dean of Students at PSU's Greater Allegheny Campus. JD from Duquesne 1983, Prosecuting Attorney Bureau of Consumer Protection. First black woman elected to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas 1989 - 2006. Appointed interim Supreme Court Justice by Governor Ed Rendell.Jan 2008 Duane Morris, LLP -. appellate litigation non-profit issues. VP / General Counsel at PSU Jan 2010 to announced resignation in Jan 2012   President PSU Alumni Assn 1989-91.and Chair of the Board of Trustees 2004-07.

What happened to Cynthia Baldwin seems a complete mystery? 

 Continuing yesterday's  PROSECUTION or PERSECUTION - CONSPIRACY of SILENCE we can compare Graham Spanier, Tim Culey and Gary Schultz's actions to Cynthia Baldwin - the person these administrators believed was representing them and Penn State at the Grand Jury.

PSU President Graham Spanier was a good friend and benefactor to Cynthia, putting her name forward for several awards and honors over his 16 years at the helm of PSU. He approved her request to resign from the board and take over as in-house General Counsel & VP when the Board decided to go with in-house counsel in January 2010. Turns out that may be the biggest mistake Graham ever made. 

In 2012, Graham Spanier was under review for a very high security clearance from the Department of Defense and the Intelligence community, since he was involved with:
National Security Higher Education Advisory Board,
The National Counterintelligence Working Group, and
The Board of Advisors for the President at the Naval Postgraduate School & War College

Baldwin told the federal Office of Personnel Management in early 2012 that Spanier was very smart, “a man of integrity,” and “very forthcoming and open” with the board of trustees. 
About six months later she testified before a grand jury that Spanier told a series of lies and misleading statements before and after Sandusky was arrested in late 2011. 

How does that make any sense, Cynthia? How can a person make 180 degree opposite claims in 6 months. In early 2012 Spanier is a "forthcoming open man of integrity" - half a year later he's a "misleading liar". 

When you read the POST HEARING MEMORANDUM from Graham Spanier's Attorneys you will be even more astounded at Cynthia Baldwin's behavior and statements along with the court's acceptance of this behavior. Typically I would not suggest a full reading of a long legal document, but this one is simply astounding. Some excerpts:

Read more »
Posted by at 10 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 23

PROSECUTION or PERSECUTION - The CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

FEAR & LOATHING in HAPPY VALLEY - PENN STATE LEADERS UNDER ATTACK
by Barry Bozeman
“ The District Attorney is a quasi-judicial officer. He represents the commonwealth and the commonwealth demands no victims. It seeks justice only--equal and impartial justice-- and it is as much the duty of the district attorney to see that no innocent man suffers as it is to see that no guilty man escapes. Hence, he should act impartially. He should present the commonwealth’s case fairly, and should not press upon the jury any deductions from the evidence that are not strictly legitimate. When he exceeds this limit, and in hot zeal seeks to influence them by appealing to their prejudices, he is no longer an impartial official, but becomes a heated partisan.” Bailey v. Commonwealth, 193 Ky. 687, 237 S.W. 

In Nov of 2012 mere weeks prior to relinquishing the office to which she was appointed by Tom Corbett, Linda Kelly once again takes the stage to proffer charges against Penn State's former President Graham Spanier and to alter the charges against former AD Tim Curley and VP Gary Schultz. 
SMSS was on this development prior to the typical staged circus designed by Kelly et al to maximize the theater for the chattering hyena class sometimes known as the media. Once again she fills her stage with a large supporting cast, this time featuring more uniforms than a meeting of the Chiefs of Staff. 

 One thing leaps out at us from the beginning when taking more than a cursory glance at this freak show. What exactly was the motive for this Conspiracy of Silence touted by the Freeh Fiction and the Persecution? Why would covering for an ex-coach no longer on the payroll of PSU be of the slightest benefit to Graham Spanier, Tim Curley or Gary Schultz? Please keep that in mind as you delve deeper into this morass of prevarications. 

Read more »
Posted by at 3 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, April 21

PROSECUTORS - POWER CONFLICT and CORRUPTION with UNLIMITED RESOURCES

FEAR & LOATHING in HAPPY VALLEY
by Barry Bozeman (an homage to Dr. Gonzo, who would have done justice to this story)
Prosecutors are “shepherds of justice.” When a government lawyer, with enormous resources at his or her disposal, abuses power and ignores ethical standards, he or she undermines public trust and inflicts damage beyond calculation to our system of justice. This consequence, alone, compels the responsible and ethical exercise of this power.
CORBETT, KELLY, BEEMER, FINA, BALDWIN, and FREEH

These 5 PROSECUTORS have the wealth and power of the entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at their disposal and, in the case of prosecutor Freeh, 8.2 million Penn State dollars that he used to trash The Penn State Culture. 

CORBETT and BALDWIN both hold or held positions on the Penn State Board of Trustees. 
CORBETT became GOVERNOR.
BALDWIN was the GENERAL COUNSEL for Penn State University.

CORBETT was ATTORNEY GENERAL when the Grand Jury was convened. 
KELLY was CORBETT'S hand picked successor. She did not seek election.
BEEMER was KELLY'S chief of staff. 
FINA was lead prosecutor on the Curley, Schultz, and Spanier cases until he resigned. 
BEEMER took over for FINA.

The SLIME also RISES -- Segments of the following contain language and descriptions Dr. Gonzo might have used were he still with us. Hunter S Thompson (HST) was a master of descriptive hyperbole for effect. Picture: by Ralph Steadman, HST's artist of record.
PROSECUTORS PLAN NOVEMBER 5 PRESS CONFERENCE TO PERSECUTE PENN STATE
Well ... to hell with writing with reserved respect for the subjects of this essay. These malicious mendicants feeding from the public trough don't deserve polite measured consideration. These are bottom-feeding mutants on steroids, unfit for reason or respect. The Commonwealth has had more than its fair share of slimy creatures dredged up from permanently smoldering underground coal pits and fracking contaminated aquifers, particularly the prosecutors and judges who seem to flourish while committing some of the most heinous crimes in memory, crimes against children -- KIDS FOR CASH. 

 CORBETT is a real piece of work. You can contemplate his Lebanon Valley BA and St Mary's Law Degree, as the absolute minimum requirement. His stint as counsel for Waste Management is so odorous that he has wiped it from his bio. As a prosecutor, Corbett is ethically unfit by the standards set forth by the American Bar Association: 
“ The duty of a prosecuting attorney is not to persecute, but to prosecute, and that he should endeavor to protect the innocent as well as to prosecute the guilty. He should always be interested in seeing that the truth and the right shall prevail….”
The muddy, blood-spattered path from prosecutor to higher political office is well worn and often traveled. PA politicians have plumbed the furthest depths of this sewer more often than most. It's an obvious route, where vastly superior resources in staff and wealth are pitted against individuals forced to pay hideous amounts of money to well-connected mouthpieces or suffer the consequences of representation by a court-appointed well meaning dullard of less than equal wit with none of the resources. Prosecutors have all the advantage and, too often, pursue publicity or a high conviction rate at the expense of truth or justice. The current reigning champion example of this being The West Memphis Three

Read more »
Posted by at 8 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, April 14

Tom Corbett vs Graham Spanier - THE PENN STATE CULTURE

by Barry Bozeman
FOR THE FUTURE - we must recognize the past. 

The announcement yesterday of the great achievement of the FOR THE FUTURE campaign reminds us of when that campaign began back in April of 2010.

Penn State sets $2 billion goal for campaign to help students

April 23, 2010  University Park, Pa. – President Graham Spanier announced that Penn State will aim to secure $2 billion by 2014 to ensure that the University can continue to offer an outstanding education to students from every economic background while benefiting the public through research and service.
 Penn State raises more than $2 billion in For the Future campaign
April 12, 2014 -- Penn State doubled the amount collected in its last 7 year drive, became one of only 12 public universities in the country to exceed $2 billion in a fundraising campaign, and convinced more alumni to donate along the way than in any other campaign in the nation.
Graham Spanier's 16 year tenure as Penn State University just keeps on giving. We have to wonder why it had to stop. A brief history lesson that should be known to all Penn Staters. 

Read more »
Posted by at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 5

The McQueary Evolution

by Barry Bozeman

 In the wake of ESPN's Outside the Lines and ESPN the magazines article "THE WHISTLEBLOWER'S LAST STAND", I am revisiting my thoughts about Mike McQueary and his pivotal role in what became the Penn State Sex Scandal. 


The first comment I ever made on the Penn State/ Second Mile/ Sandusky revelations came the day of Linda Kelly’s Press Conference on Nov. 4 2011. As an active participant on the Tennessee Scout sports forums I injected a comment in a long thread of people literally calling for McQueary’s head on a pike. The anger and hatred of McQueary was visceral. “How could a big strong football coach in good shape fail to step in and kick the crap out of an old man who was raping a 10 year old boy”?

Well I could not wrap my head around it either so I felt there must be something else going on and I knew the true nature of a Grand Jury Presentment. Knowing that presentment was not an unassailable statement of fact I tried to caution my fellow Volunteer fans to reserve judgment until all the facts were in. That seemed to be a big mistake. People were angry. Angry at Penn State, at Joe Paterno, at Tim Curley and Gary Schultz and very angry with Mike McQueary.

If Linda Kelly’s goal was to destroy Penn State and Joe Paterno in the court of public opinion, she succeeded beyond her wildest dreams. If this was the reaction on sports forums for the Tennessee Volunteers it had to be the reaction across the country on similar forums. I’m not sure why I thought there was far more to this story than seemed evident in the PA Attorney Generals presentation but I became intent on finding out. That led to the creation of this weblog and a long history of exploring the case. 

I actually felt sorry for Mike McQueary. I thought he must have been an abused child – possibly abused by Jerry Sandusky. I tried to imagine how shocked I might have been if I had seen what the Presentment claims he saw. But over time I came to a much different conclusion concerning McQueary and his role in this entire affair. There is no question that Mike McQueary was used by the Office of the Attorney General to make The Second Mile Sandusky Scandal into the Penn State Scandal. The only question I want to consider now is whether he was a willing participant, a coerced participant, or and unwitting dupe.

Over time much thought and effort has been focused on attempting to understand what McQueary actually saw. Linda Kelly’s presentment stated this “most credible” witness “SAW a boy being subjected to anal rape” by Jerry Sandusky. McQueary has made it clear that this overstates his observation. This website was the first to obtain and publish pictures of the locker room where this took place. 

What we do know about that night is that McQueary phoned home and then left the Lasch building to meet with his father and family friend Dr. Dranov that night. The following morning he had a 10 minute conversation with Joe Paterno. And several days later he met with Tim Curley and Gary Schultz to tell them what he had observed.

Even if we can accept that McQueary was so freaked out by what he saw or thought he saw at the Lasch building that he could not react in a manner to protect the child that Kelly says he observed being raped, can we accept that condition made it impossible for him to convey the nature of the heinous crime to his own father and long time family friend Dr. Dranov?

 A_2bman_2band_2bchild_mediumMcQeary says the child's height in comparison to Sandusky placed his head at the pectoral muscles of Sandusky's chest.

 Here is the point where McQueary's description of the end of his observation becomes important. McQueary says he faced the boy and Sandusky standing a couple of feet apart both observing him. He does not say the child showed any discomfort or surprise much less any fear, pain, embarrassment, or horror over whatever had happened. How is it possible that a small child of that size would not be in pain or greatly distressed if those slapping sounds were a big man driving himself into the child? And perhaps more importantly, how could a grown man desert a small child who was fearful or in pain to the person who was responsible for that situation? 

Read more »
Posted by at 21 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, December 19

Baldwin Highlights of Grand Jury Testimony from Twitter

By Ray Blehar, Jimmy W, and No.1 Lion 99

Bold Black indicates erroneous or contradicted statement of Baldwin's.  There are many.
Red type indicates important statements from Frank Fina.

The biggest news to come out of the proceeding was that Sandusky was accused of a sexual abuse  in 1984.  The OAG didn't find any police record of it.  To date, few media outlets have done little more than make mention of it.

A full summary of the proceeding will appear in this space soon.



  2. 1h
    1984 allegation surfaces in Spanier colloquy. Connection?
    Expand
  3. 3h
    RT Baldwin GJT, P14, L12,13: Baldwin says Spanier told her to go to GJ with him during Jan 2011 mtg. Spanier was not subpoenaed at the time.
    Expand
  4. 3h
    RT BaldwinGJT: P13, L11,12: Baldwin stated that RETIRED Gary Schultz was "on vacation" when she received the subpoena for his GJ appearance
    Expand
  5. 3h
    Who were Vs 11-17? From CMHS?
      View summary
  6. 3h
    CB said gathering of info back to 1997 was taking time, but would have it in 2 days. Corro tasked in March. S1179 was issued 12/11?
     View conversation
  7. 3h
    Corro produced 3 USBs for CB. CB said one USB 2b provided on 4/15. Possible one was provided on 4/13/11 of just Spanier's e-mails.
     View conversation
  8. 3h
    If e-mails were due Jan 10 & CB didn't file motion to quash, where was GJ Contempt motion? Something fishy here?
     View conversation
  9. 6h
    Sassano trial testimony: "And Penn State...was not very quick in getting us our information." Ref. Sub. 191 for names of janitors.
    Expand
  10. 6h
    Spanier met with OAG on 3/22/11, before his 4/13/11 GJ testimony. When did Baldwin have her dress rehearsal?
     View conversation
    1. 9h
      (2/2) Baldwin affidavit omitted role of DPW in 1998 & exposed 2002 incident.
       View conversation
    2. 9h
      CB May '11 brief to BOT violated GJ secrecy b/c she disclosed the 2002 incident, which was not public info (1/2)
       View conversation
    3. 9h
      Baldwin was not a witness until October 2012. Illegal for her to disclose testimony.
       View conversation

    4. 9h
      proves could not have known details of 1998 report. Laws made conf.
       Retweeted by 


       Expand
    5. 9h
      Acc to Baldwin GJ testimony, Sandusky eluded arrests in 1984 & 1998 after he was reported. Laws r not the problem
       View conversation
    6. 13h
      All this background was in response to CB's oral motion to quash - rationale for far reaching subpoenas for emails.
       View conversation
    7. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P15, L1-4: Fina mentioned masked comments & metaphors in emails, indicating OAG had the e-mails prior to April 2011.
      Expand
    8. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P9, L20-23: Fina says matter was serious b/c Joe had Tim & Gary come to his home. WRONG. JVP's kitchen table notorious 4 mtgs
      Expand
    9. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P9, L1-19: Fina describes McQ report of 2001 incident, omitting John McQ and Dr. Dranov from chain of reporting.
      Expand
    10. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P8, L14-17: Fina says investigator believed 1998 police report (title) was altered after he filed it.
      Expand
    11. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P7-8: Fina mentions 1984 allegation against Sandusky. No police paperwork on it.


       Expand
    12. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P6. L14-17: Feudale also confident that security of grand jury won't be breached. ROTFLMAO .
      Expand
    13. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P4-5: Baldwin asked why she didn't make motion to quash. She then attempts oral motion to quash.
      Expand
    14. 22h
      Spanier, COL, P3, L13-24: In April 2011, Fina assures Baldwin there will be no leaks of info from the grand jury. ROTFLMAO!
      Expand
    15. 22h
      Baldwin GJT, P73, L16-21: Fina told Baldwin there were only TWO grand juries. Baldwin: "Um--hum" Then CB says Spanier misunderstood
      Expand
    16. 22h
      Baldwin GJT, P73, L6-10: Says Athletics, Finance, & Prez Office had lion's share of data. WRONG. IT specialists needed to retrieve data.
      Expand
    17. 22h
      Baldwin GJT, P73, L6-10: Says VP of Finance was one of three people who didn't respond. Horvath was VP when S1179 issued, but not charged.
      Expand
    18. 22h
      Baldwin GJT, P73, L3-5: So ff they sent directly, how did CB know subpoena was answered? (2/2) Half-assed operation.
      Expand
    19. 22h
      Baldwin GJT, P73, L3-5: CB outlined how subpoenas got answered. They sent it for us to send or sometimes they sent it on, directly. (1/2)
      Expand
    20. 22h
      Baldwin GJT, P70, L17-19: And there it is. Apartment lease ended in June 2012, for a job she was supposed to have until August 2011. !
      Expand
    21. 22h
      Baldwin GJT, P70, L1-12: Baldwin misstated term of her contract, stating it was until Aug 2011 -- when it was until June 2012.
      Expand
    22. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P70, L2-11: CB says Spanier lied to her the whole time to keep things from her. Quite a motive!
      Expand
    23. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P69, L6-14: No awareness of 98 & 01 emails & notes the whole time, but told of possible Schultz file + got emails from PSU IT
      Expand
    24. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P64, L14-18: (2/2) Spanier believed invest concerned 2001 shower incident only. 1998 cleared =no issue. Clinton Cty = Not PSU
      Expand
    25. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P64, L14-18: (1/2) Baldwin answers out of context, confusing Spanier's knowledge (more) with his concern (less)
      Expand
    26. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P64, L2-8: Fina incorrectly stated Sub 1179 referenced 1998 and 2001 - it actually referenced 2002.
      Expand
    27. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P63, L19-22: Baldwin stated told GS knew about 98 & 01 in April b/c she briefed the BOT about those incidents in May.
      Expand
    28. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P61, L7-11: Baldwin stated told GS she was confident Sandusky would be charged. Powers: CB called it a "fishing expedition"
      Expand
    29. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P59, L20-25: Baldwin stated she told Spanier his e-mails would be subpoenaed. Contradicted by Spanier in NewYorker
      Expand
    30. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P59, L1-11: Baldwin stated Spanier had to know other victims were coming fwd b/c of 3/31/11 PN article.
      Expand
    31. 23h
      Baldwin GJT re Subpoenas: Source close to Curley family stated that Baldwin never provided subpoena to Tim Curley.
      Expand
    32. 23h
      Baldwin GJT re Subpoenas: Source close to Paterno family stated that Baldwin did not willingly provide subpoena to JVP.
      Expand
    33. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P51, L20-23: Baldwin stated she told Spanier there were 3-4 grand jury panels. There were just two.
      Expand

    1. 23h
      Baldwin GJT, P45, L1-15: Baldwin lies about Spanier's role to brief the BOT on investigation & arrests. Her job IAW Standing Orders of BOT
      Expand
    2. 18 Dec
      Baldwin GJT, P36, L3-15: Baldwin briefed BOT on 2001 and 1998 incidents b/c they were in 3/31/11 PN article, but 2001 not mentioned in PN.
      Expand
    3. 18 Dec
      Baldwin GJT: Baldwin advised Spanier to disclose his GJ testimony AFTER Feudale issued non-disclosure order in Feb 2011
      Expand
    4. 18 Dec
      Baldwin GJT, P36, L18-20: Baldwin says BOT members asked her Qs at May 2011 BOT mtg. BOT member said no Qs asked b/c Baldwin downplayed it.
      Expand
    5. 18 Dec
      Baldwin GJT, P34, L21-25: Baldwin says her role is NOT to brief BOT on Sandusky investigation. Contradicted by Standing Orders of BOT
      Expand
    6. 18 Dec
      Baldwin GJT, P23, L4-7: Baldwin told Spanier that he would be told about sodomy & pedophila. Spanier contradicted Baldwin in NewYorker.
      Expand
    1. 18 Dec
      Baldwin GJT, P28, L1-3: Baldwin stated she told Spanier everything. Spanier said Baldwin kept him in the dark.
      Expand
    2. 18 Dec
      Baldwin GJT, P27, L14-17: Baldwin stated she told Spanier he was subpoenaed. Spaniers BOT letter contradicts Baldwin

      1. 18 Dec
        (2/2) Apparently, Baldwin believed that included NOT PROVIDING them to the concerned parties.
         View conversation
      2. 18 Dec
        Baldwin revised the OGC Policy to exercise prerogative in sending to other parties. (1/2)
         View conversation

      3. 18 Dec
        p28 Baldwin states she represents the university Feudale: "The university solely?" Baldwin: "Yes.. solely" Spanier not present
         Retweeted by 

         View conversation

        1. 18 Dec
          Funny her email about that & the one to preserve documents were not mentioned/included in the Freeh Report.
           View conversation

        2. 18 Dec
          But she did tell Feudale on 4/13/11 that she would have over a USB by Friday 4/15/11. P27 of colloquy
           Retweeted by 
           View conversation
        3. 18 Dec
          About that 1998 police report:
           View conversation
        4. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P25, L2,3: Baldwin claims Spanier got 1998 info from Tim & Gary, but Harmon stated he never provided 1998 rpt to Schultz
          Expand
        5. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P24, L1-24: Baldwin obtained 1998 police rpt, didn't show it to Spanier, but sez Spanier knew by getting info from "elsewhere"
          Expand

        6. 18 Dec
          So caught up in cya, she could not remember all the lies she told. (To a grand jury nonetheless)
           Retweeted by 
           View conversation
        7. 18 Dec
          Feudale's nondisclosure order was mentioned in transcripts of July 2013 Preliminary Hearing.
           View conversation
        8. 18 Dec
          According to trial verdicts, V9 was being abused into the fall of 2009.
           View conversation
        9. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P21, L7-21: Baldwin said she told Spanier he could tell the BOT anything he testified about. Contradicted by Feudale order.
          Expand
        10. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P20, L12-24: Baldwin denied ever being told about Schultz file. Contradicted by Schultz affidavit.
          Expand
        11. 18 Dec
          People suspected something was up when JS didn't show up at the kickoff event for the 2009 TSM Golf Tournament.
           View conversation
        12. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P19, L7-21: Baldwin said Spanier said he had no e-mails. Spanier said he was never asked to look.
           View summary
        13. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P19, L1-6: Baldwin said Schultz told her he had no documents. Contradicted by Schultz affidavit.
          Expand

        14. 12h

          But it is on the record Baldwin was there when Schultz told the GJ about the file on 1/12/2011. P204&217
          Expand
          Ray Blehar           ‏@RayBlehar18 Dec
        15. 18 Dec
          More about Subpoena 1179 here:
          Expand
        16. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P18, L5-11: Baldwin said specifics about 1179 told to C/S/S, yet all 3 testified to differing dates of 2001 shower incident.
          Expand
        17. 18 Dec
          Agree. Some probably as early as Spring 2009.
           View conversation
        18. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P16, L13-24: Spanier also contradicted Baldwin's preservation story. In New Yorker Mag, said he was not told about Sub 1179.
          Expand
        19. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P16, L13-24: (2/2) PSU IT Dept (Corro) contradicted CB. He testified he was shown part of the Subpeona in March 2011.
          Expand
        20. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P16, L13-24: Baldwin stated she gave preservation notice to C/S/S & PSU IT dept in response to of Sub 1179. (1/2)
          Expand
        21. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P14, L16-20: Baldwin stated she repped PSU & C/S/S as its agents.
          Expand
        22. 18 Dec
            View summary
        23. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT, P14, L12,13: Baldwin says Spanier told her to go to GJ with him during Jan 2011 mtg. Spanier was not subpoenaed at the time.
          Expand

        24. 18 Dec
          BaldwinGJT: P13, L11,12: Baldwin stated that RETIRED Gary Schultz was "on vacation" when she received the subpoena for his GJ appearance
          Expand
        25. 18 Dec
          BaldwinGJT: P12, L10: Fina reminded Baldwin of Sub 1179, issued Oct 2010.
          Expand
        26. 18 Dec
          Baldwin GJT. P11, L19: First learned of JS investigation 12/28/2010. Contradicted by July 2013 testimony of L. Powers. CB knew in Oct 2010
          Expand
          1. 18 Dec
            Later, Powers heard from Al Horvath abt reporter camping out @ Harmon's house in Feb 2011, p14-15
             View conversation
          2. 18 Dec
            But I do imagine she was involved in compiling the list of people aware of this subpoena on 3/1/2010 (Freeh p.82, note 382 p.154)
             View conversation
          3. 18 Dec
            And even though Baldwin didn't start until 2/15/2011, she was never asked about this subpoena in her GJ testimony
             View conversation
          4. 18 Dec
            It seems Horvath, as VP in charge of HR, would've seen 1/7/2010 subpoena for Sandusky personnel records. (Freeh p.82)
             View conversation
Posted by at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)