Bold Black indicates erroneous or contradicted statement of Baldwin's. There are many.
Red type indicates important statements from Frank Fina.
The biggest news to come out of the proceeding was that Sandusky was accused of a sexual abuse in 1984. The OAG didn't find any police record of it. To date, few media outlets have done little more than make mention of it.
A full summary of the proceeding will appear in this space soon.
@gregbucceroni 1984 allegation surfaces in Spanier colloquy. Connection? http://www.infowars.com/self-described-child-prostitute-links-sandusky-to-poly-prep-sex-abuse-scandal-coach-phil-foglietta/ …@MarkHorgas@JmmyW CB said gathering of info back to 1997 was taking time, but would have it in 2 days. Corro tasked in March. S1179 was issued 12/11?@JmmyW Corro produced 3 USBs for CB. CB said one USB 2b provided on 4/15. Possible one was provided on 4/13/11 of just Spanier's e-mails.@JmmyW If e-mails were due Jan 10 & CB didn't file motion to quash, where was GJ Contempt motion? Something fishy here?@No1Lion99@ChiTownLionPSU Spanier met with OAG on 3/22/11, before his 4/13/11 GJ testimony. When did Baldwin have her dress rehearsal?
@No1Lion99@ChiTownLionPSU (2/2) Baldwin affidavit omitted role of DPW in 1998 & exposed 2002 incident. http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2013/01/did-cynthia-baldwin-commit-perjury-in.html …@No1Lion99@ChiTownLionPSU CB May '11 brief to BOT violated GJ secrecy b/c she disclosed the 2002 incident, which was not public info (1/2)@No1Lion99 Baldwin was not a witness until October 2012. Illegal for her to disclose testimony. http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/234/chapter5/s556.10.html …
#Baldwin proves#Paterno could not have known details of 1998 report. Laws made conf.@RayBlehar@ChiTownLionPSU pic.twitter.com/dGwyDp0Kv4Retweeted by Ray Blehar@wensilver@ProtectPAKids Acc to Baldwin GJ testimony, Sandusky eluded arrests in 1984 & 1998 after he was reported. Laws r not the problem@JmmyW All this background was in response to CB's oral motion to quash - rationale for far reaching subpoenas for emails.- Spanier, COL, P8, L14-17: Fina says investigator believed 1998 police report (title) was altered after he filed it. http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2012/08/altered-e-mail-found-in-freeh-report.html …
- Spanier, COL, P7-8: Fina mentions 1984 allegation against Sandusky. No police paperwork on it. pic.twitter.com/ToJS8H21Lk
- Spanier, COL, P4-5: Baldwin asked why she didn't make motion to quash. She then attempts oral motion to quash.
#WorldsWorstLawyer - Baldwin GJT, P73, L3-5: So ff they sent directly, how did CB know subpoena was answered? (2/2) Half-assed operation.
#WorldsDumbestLawyer - Baldwin GJT, P70, L2-11: CB says Spanier lied to her the whole time to keep things from her. Quite a motive!
#WorldsWorstLawyer - Baldwin GJT, P59, L1-11: Baldwin stated Spanier had to know other victims were coming fwd b/c of 3/31/11 PN article.
#MindReader - Baldwin GJT, P51, L20-23: Baldwin stated she told Spanier there were 3-4 grand jury panels. There were just two.
#WorldsDumbestLawyer
- Baldwin GJT: Baldwin advised Spanier to disclose his GJ testimony AFTER Feudale issued non-disclosure order in Feb 2011
#WorldsWorstLawyer - Baldwin GJT, P23, L4-7: Baldwin told Spanier that he would be told about sodomy & pedophila. Spanier contradicted Baldwin in NewYorker.
- Baldwin GJT, P28, L1-3: Baldwin stated she told Spanier everything. Spanier said Baldwin kept him in the dark. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/08/graham-spanier-interview-on-sandusky-scandal.html …
- Baldwin GJT, P27, L14-17: Baldwin stated she told Spanier he was subpoenaed. Spaniers BOT letter contradicts Baldwin http://onwardstate.com/2012/07/23/espn-obtains-spanier-letter-to-board-of-trustees/ …
@apgfd12@JmmyW (2/2) Apparently, Baldwin believed that included NOT PROVIDING them to the concerned parties.#WorldsWorstLawyer@apgfd12@JmmyW Baldwin revised the OGC Policy to exercise prerogative in sending to other parties. (1/2) http://guru.psu.edu/policies/AD49.html …
@RayBlehar p28 Baldwin states she represents the university Feudale: "The university solely?" Baldwin: "Yes.. solely" Spanier not presentRetweeted by Ray Blehar@JmmyW Funny her email about that & the one to preserve documents were not mentioned/included in the Freeh Report.#LiarLiarPantsOnFire
@RayBlehar But she did tell Feudale on 4/13/11 that she would have over a USB by Friday 4/15/11. P27 of colloquy http://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/direct/192201085?extension=pdf&ft=1387386094<=1387389704&source=embed&uahk=/WVhL9DHRtfKuYf+9F26Qa9ApGw …- About that 1998 police report: http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2013/08/tom-harmon-untold-story_30.html …
@RayBlehar So caught up in cya, she could not remember all the lies she told. (To a grand jury nonetheless)@4TreeClimbers Feudale's nondisclosure order was mentioned in transcripts of July 2013 Preliminary Hearing.@JmmyW@F3perjury According to trial verdicts, V9 was being abused into the fall of 2009.- Baldwin GJT, P20, L12-24: Baldwin denied ever being told about Schultz file. Contradicted by Schultz affidavit. http://www.dauphincounty.org/government/Court-Departments/Curley-Schultz-Spanier/Documents/Schultz%20Omnibus%20Pre-Trial%20Motion%2010-31-12.pdf …
@F3perjury People suspected something was up when JS didn't show up at the kickoff event for the 2009 TSM Golf Tournament.- Baldwin GJT, P19, L7-21: Baldwin said Spanier said he had no e-mails. Spanier said he was never asked to look. http://onwardstate.com/2012/07/23/espn-obtains-spanier-letter-to-board-of-trustees/ …
- Baldwin GJT, P19, L1-6: Baldwin said Schultz told her he had no documents. Contradicted by Schultz affidavit. http://www.dauphincounty.org/government/Court-Departments/Curley-Schultz-Spanier/Documents/Schultz%20Omnibus%20Pre-Trial%20Motion%2010-31-12.pdf …
@RayBlehar But it is on the record Baldwin was there when Schultz told the GJ about the file on 1/12/2011. P204&217 http://www.dauphincounty.org/government/Court-Departments/CurleySchultz/12-16-Preliminary-Trial-Transcript.pdf …@RayBlehar18 Dec- More about Subpoena 1179 here: http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2013/04/baldwin-perjury-never-told-psu.html …
@F3perjury Agree. Some probably as early as Spring 2009.- Baldwin GJT. P11, L19: First learned of JS investigation 12/28/2010. Contradicted by July 2013 testimony of L. Powers. CB knew in Oct 2010
@rayblehar Later, Powers heard from Al Horvath abt reporter camping out @ Harmon's house in Feb 2011, p14-15 http://www.dauphincounty.org/government/Court-Departments/Curley-Schultz-Spanier/Documents/July%2030,%202013%20Preliminary%20Hearing%20Transcript%201%20of%202.PDF …@rayblehar But I do imagine she was involved in compiling the list of people aware of this subpoena on 3/1/2010 (Freeh p.82, note 382 p.154)@rayblehar And even though Baldwin didn't start until 2/15/2011, she was never asked about this subpoena in her GJ testimony@rayblehar It seems Horvath, as VP in charge of HR, would've seen 1/7/2010 subpoena for Sandusky personnel records. (Freeh p.82)
What's remarkable to me is that Baldwin was Chair of PSU BoT until becoming PSU General Counsel. And she held that position from, I believe, Jan 2010 to summer 2012.
ReplyDeleteThis is entirely too convenient timing. To think her positions, and the privileged access they gave her to info, were not intentionally related to the Sandusky case is not possible for me.
What struck me was how Judge Feudale was so friendly with Baldwin that he addressed her as Cindy in a formal proceedings. That seemed inappropriate.
ReplyDeleteThen after he asked Cindy whom she was there to represent he did nothing when Cindy answered solely to represent Penn State.
Feudale should have informed Spanier that he would have to reschedule after he found a lawyer to represent him and informed Cindy that she could not attend the grand jury hearing just as a representative of Penn State.