Over half of the NCAA's and PSU's objections soundly rejected in very brief arguments by Judge Leete. Plaintiffs (Paterno, et al) can file amended complaints on 5 of the 8 objections that were sustained.
By
Ray Blehar
PATERNO v. NCAA SCOREBOARD
September 11, 2014
Defendants, NCAA and Penn State succeeded
on only 28.6% of their combined objections,
however over half of those may be challenged.
however over half of those may be challenged.
Twitter highlights starting at Impertinent Material and Demurrer to Count 1.
Please read from bottom to top.
Please read from bottom to top.
P. 33 PSU objection "Missing Letter in Request # 3" was overruled. Procedural error has been corrected.
P. 33: Big Loss for plaintiffs and the public. No non-confidential pretrial discovery info can be released to the public.
p. 31: PSU loses to exclude subpoenas from "The Paterno Family." Already rule upon in preliminary objections.
P. 30: Exception for Freeh invoices denied....invoices may lead to new evidence. PSU on losing streak.
P 30: Court denies PSU motion to exclude documents post 7-23-2011. Freeh kept getting paid after that. Money talks, BS walks!
P. 29 PSU loses on "Invasive of Confidentiality" and documents already in the "Public Domain."
P. 29 denies PSU objection search being COSTLY, burdensome. #LAFFER
P 26&27: Overruled PSU's objection that findings in Freeh Report were opinions. Held that info rel to NCAA, Emmert, & Ray too speculative
P. 26. Judge rules info about criminal investigations shared with Freeh by PSU is discoverable.
P. 25: CHRIA will only apply in a limited number of cases....arrests, indictments, depositions, etc that were collected from the UPPD.
P. 24. FERPA - no privilege exists for PSU under FERPA.
P. 24 discusses search of 3.5M emails. Plaintiffs to provide search terms to PSU. PSU to perform search and provide privilege log.
p. 23. Judge rules "self-examination" objection does not apply to PSU. PA law doesn't recognize it. Just call me Steve Dumb-ham!
p23. Leete says attorney-client work product privilege does not apply to PSU.
p. 21: Leete states documents shared with NCAA, Big Ten not subject to A/C privildge, citing Serrano case.
p. 18. PSU fails on same grounds as @NCAA in "Failure to Comply" objection.
P. 18. PSU again cites nonspecifics on civil conspiracy. Plaintiffs to provide 2nd filing. BTW, this is b/c PSU was a "nominal defendant."
p. 17: Favors PSU argument of lack of specifics as 3rd Party beneficiaries. Plaintiffs have opporunity to file specifics.
p. 16: PSU argument it didn't violate @NCAA By-laws or procedures holds. Plaintiffs requested to provide 2nd filing.
P. 16: PSU loses identical rulings as @NCAA Clemens standing & JVP, Jay, Bill Kenney, and Al Clemens civil conspiracy.
Page 16: Leete agrees with PSU that there is insufficient info for them to defend. Plaintiffs to refile to provide specifics.
Page 15: Lack of Jurisdiction over Emmert and Ray "set aside." To be ruled on separately.
Page 14: @NCAA's Objection based Failure to Conform argument rendered moot. Procedural defect corrected.
Page 14: @NCAA loses again on Commercial disparagement. Judge states "no new argument" made.
Page 14: Leete whacks @NCAA badly citing Consent Decree -- statements in it are defamatory. Count V holds.
Page 11: JVP, Jay, Bill Kenney, and Al Clemens have standing for civil conspiracy claims...remaining plaintiffs do not.
Page 10. Ruling in favor of Jay and Bill Kenney. Provided sufficient evidence for tortious interference.
Page 8. Judge rules JVP is not an involved party due to his demise, but Clemens is. @NCAA still losing badly.
Reading Judge Leete's ruling. Page 7 states NCAA "used circuitous logic." So far, @NCAA losing badly. @MarkHorgas @No1Lion99
Thank you. Ray, been reading results and this is helpful.
ReplyDeleteGreat reporting!
ReplyDelete