Friday, October 2

Toyota Drives Big Hole in Heim's Response To Controversy

Bruce Heim's statements about The Second Mile's role in the Sandusky had holes so big that you could drive a -- TOYOTA -- through them!

By
Ray Blehar

Yesterday, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette reported Bruce Heim's response to the controversy over his participation in Saturday's coin toss at the Penn State - Army game.  

It comes as no surprise that Heim skirted his charity's culpability in the matter by hanging his hat on the fact the charity has yet to be charged in the Sandusky matter.   However, that by no means is proof the charity did nothing wrong.  

The evidence tells quite a different story than Mr. Heim:

HEIM: “By not going out, I would be admitting that the Second Mile did something wrong and the Second Mile didn’t do anything wrong.   The shame of this whole thing is thousands of kids are embarrassed because they were involved with the Second Mile.”

HEIM: “I was investigated by five different investigative agencies because of my association with the Second Mile. I didn’t do anything wrong. I was investigated for two years, spoke to the grand jury for over two hours. … The Second Mile didn’t do anything wrong. We didn’t think Jerry was a pedophile.”

EVIDENCE:  The May 5th, 2015 Sandusky PCRA filing shows that TSM had purchased a Toyota for a former participant for reasons allegedly unknown to the individual.  The individual eventually disclosed he had been one of Sandusky's victims.  







Federal officials referred to evidence like this as TSM's "Cars for Kids Program."

There are a number of criminal counts that could apply to this transaction, including fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, and tax evasion.  All federal matters.  



EVIDENCE: In 2009, after being informed of Sandusky's abuse investigation, the charity failed to put a protection plan in place to prevent him from accessing children.  The charity admitted that they stayed silent about his investigation and did not inform the public. Yesterday's blog post mentioned his contacts with children in 2009 and 2010 and two abuse incidents.  This evidence would support charges of Endangering the Welfare of a Child.

EVIDENCE: In late 2008, Clinton County CYS contacted The Second Mile (TSM) to inform them that Sandusky was under investigation for child abuse.  Katherine Genovese, TSM's Vice President for Development, responded that the charity "had to tell him to back off certain kids before."  



HEIM: “Jerry in my presence, in the presence of coaches, in the presence of the football team on several occasions had gone in and showered with kids,” Mr. Heim said. “I said (sic) every day at the YMCA men shower with kids.”

EVIDENCE:  Only one coach,  Richard Anderson  (a defense witness), admitted that he saw Sandusky showering with a child.  The prosecution did not present any Penn State coaches as witnesses of Sandusky showering with children.  (Source: Sandusky Trial)


EVIDENCE:  There is no evidence to support that Sandusky showered with kids in the presence of the football team.  Had that occurred, there is no doubt it would have been reported in the Freeh Report. (Source: Freeh Report)


HEIM:  “Nobody in the Second Mile had any inkling that he had done anything wrong.  If you don’t believe it, then why hasn’t there been one charge brought against the Second Mile? They have been investigated just as deeply and as vigorously as Penn State was.


EVIDENCE:  Despite that fact that numerous individuals told investigators about Sandusky's association with TSM and that the first four boys interviewed in 2008 and 2009 all met Sandusky through the charity, the Pennsylvania State Police and Office of Attorney General investigators failed to secure a search warrant or subpoena the charity for information until January 28, 2011. (Source: Moulton Report)



EVIDENCE:  Investigators did not Subpoena participant lists from The Second Mile until March 24, 2011. (Source: Moulton Report)


Special Deputy Attorney General Geoffrey Moulton stated there "were inexplicable delays in bringing a serial child molester to justice."   The failure to promptly investigate TSM was among them.


AG Kathleen Kane, in an interview with the Patriot News, stated her office was not investigating TSM.  As noted above, the possible crimes involved in the case are federal matters.

TSM is not out of the woods yet.  Not by a long shot.




7 comments:

  1. Hear! Hear! I am out of superlatives to describe your work Ray. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carole,
      Thanks for the kind words.

      Keep the faith

      Delete
  2. That's the first I've heard of Second Mile buying an abused teen a car to keep him quiet. If true, that sounds far worse than what Penn State officials are accused of.

    You mentioned that TSM's "Cars for Kids Program" might result in federal charges.

    Why wouldn't state charges apply, particularly failure to report child abuse, child endangerment, conspiracy and maybe obstruction and witness tampering?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The charges I mentioned fall under RICO statutes. Feds would likely charge obstruction and conspiracy but not FTR and endangerment. IMHO

      Delete
  3. So Ray is trying to claim that the $1,800 payment to the kid was to keep him quiet despite the fact that the kid did claim abuse, never claimed it was hush money and there's no evidence any other accuser from TSM received money. How does Ray not realize that the actions of TSM and the investigators described in this article make perfect sense if Sandusky is innocent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right. That's why the Feds called it The Cars for Kids program. Program- you do understand what that word means?

      Yeah, the kid got a car, a pickup truck and $500 cash. Read Sandusky's appeal. The kid admitted he got all those things. Why? Second Mile mission isn't providing cars and cash to teenagers.

      I guess if you're gullible enough to believe Jerry is innocent then you're also gullible enough to believe those transactions were random acts of kindness.

      Delete
    2. Jason,

      I think you need to explain why, if "Sandusky is innocent", he is in jail having been convicted on 45 counts. And perhaps you can also help Penn State get the millions returned that the trustees paid out due to Sandusky's actions while he was employed by the Second Mile (and not Penn State).

      Delete