Kenneth Frazier: Update and Petition

What will people do "to avoid the consequences of bad publicity?"  Let's find out.

Google "Kenneth Frazier" 

CURRENTLY....

First entry: Wikipedia containing update of racial remark.

2nd entry: SMSS Kenneth Frazier: Anti-Child and Anti-PSU

11th entry: SMSS Kenneth Frazier: Audio of racist remark.


What you can do to help :

1. Go to google and type:  "Kenneth Frazier"

2. Click on the SMSS Kenneth Frazier: Anti-Child link

3. Hit the back button.

4. Click on the SMSS Audio of Racist Remark.


Sign the PSU Student Petition To Remove Frazier


KEEP THE PRESSURE ON...


Mr. Frazier refuses to face the fact that PA's Child Protection system failed Sandusky's victims and is in need of reform.  He remains an obstacle to PA's flagship University in being a leader in protecting children.


Thank you for your support.

Blehar: LTE CDT, "We can all do more"

As a child protection advocate, I find Penn State trustee Ken Frazier’s words to be hollow (“Frazier issues apology,” CDT, Monday).

Frazier defends the Freeh report, which attempted to whitewash the failures of Pennsylvania’s child protection system to identify Jerry Sandusky as a child molester back in 1998. Frazier said the report was not chartered to find problems outside Penn State and that it was an internal review.

Nevertheless, the state’s and county’s failures in 1998 still showed through, even with the attempted whitewash by the Freeh group. The alumni and some Penn State trustees understand that Penn State officials were not alone when it came to those who could have done more to stop Sandusky.

As Fred Berlin said, “We can all do more.”

That would especially include Frazier, who barks the loudest about protecting children but hasn’t said a single word about the system that will let 40 children get murdered and another 25,000 get abused this year.

It is clear that Frazier and the rest of his November 2011 cohorts aren’t interested in learning about child abuse problems that occur off university property, nor do they appear to care.

The leadership of the state’s flagship university has decided not to address real reforms to make children across the state safer. That is turning a blind eye to the problem.

I call on Penn State’s leadership to call for the much-needed reforms to Pennsylvania’s child protection system.

To quote Phil LaPorta, “If we can’t do that, we shouldn’t be a university.”

RAY BLEHAR

ANNAPOLIS, MD.

Read more here: http://www.centredaily.com/2013/03/20/3546259/letter-to-the-editor-we-can-do.html#.UUmdPRhKcVk.facebook#storylink=cpy

PSU Policy AD73 Puts Children In Harm's Way

Revised policy AD73 violates one of the basic tenets of preventing child abuse -- the two person rule.  PSU' created this policy in response to the Sandusky case and it was approved on July 9, 2012. 

By
Ray Blehar

When the Freeh Report was released back in July 2012, many child protection and sexual abuse prevention advocates lauded it for the improvements in child safety on PSU's campus.  

Here's RAINN's statement:

The results of Louis Freeh's investigation are stunning. It is shocking that the disregard for the children who were victimized was so widespread, and the systemic failure so deep. Beyond whatever changes happen at Penn State as a result of this report, the leaders of every school in America need to take note today. They need to make sure that everyone knows that the safety of kids is always the highest priority, regardless of the potential embarrassment to the school. There are only two appropriate responses to a child being sexually assaulted: first, you need to immediately notify law enforcement, and second, you need to ensure that the child gets the help he or she needs to recover from the attack.

— Scott Berkowitz, president and founder of RAINN (The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network)

After reading this statement - and having previously reviewed the entire Freeh Report - I wrote Scott Berkowitz several letters and e-mails that pointed out the failures of the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare and Centre County CYS  as the primary reason that Sandusky was able to roam free for 14 years.  I asked Mr. Berkowitz to call for a review of PA DPW and CYS.  

That call never came, nor has Mr. Berkowitz ever responded to my e-mails and letters.

Report 1 Falls on Deaf Ears

RAINN, Protect Pa Children, and several other charities all received my first report (demonstrating that PA's DPW and CYS officials failed to conduct a thorough investigation in 1998 and that Louis Freeh's report downplayed the failures) , yet not a single one changed their public statements on the Freeh Report nor did they even bother to write to me to ask questions or get clarifications about my report.

Clearly, these so-called child protection and sexual abuse prevention organizations, just like the media, are "invested" the the current narrative (that PSU officials enabled Sandusky) and do not have the courage to make a stand for the truth -- which is really standing up for children.  They do not have the courage to condemn the Freeh Report for not pointing out the failures of PA child protection system.  And they do not have the courage to stand up and call for real reforms in the PA child protection system.  

They should not be rewarded for their acts of cowardice that are keeping PA's children in harm's way.  RAINN, protectpachildren.org, pa-fsa.org, abolishsexabuse.org, should not receive a single dime from Penn State Alumni.

PSU Policy AD73

The Penn State Board of Trustees, under mounting pressure from alumni, have retreated to the position that they hired Freeh to improve governance and have committed to implementing the report's recommendations.  They have patted themselves on the back for the progress they've made.

However, as Jim Clemente, pointed out, the recommendations of the Freeh report did nothing to help people identify and protect children from "nice guy-pillar of the community" pedophiles.  Clemente, in an interview with Media Mayhem's Alison Hope Weiner, pointed out that Freeh had no prior experience investigating sexual abuse cases.

Clemente's revelation helps to explain why PSU Policy AD73 not only fails to protect children, but actually places them in similar one-on-one situations that Sandusky used to abuse children.  Policy follows (my emphasis added):

POLICY:

It is the policy of the Pennsylvania State University that all Athletics facilities (spaces typically, but not solely, designated for specific intercollegiate athletic program(s) use) will be accessible only by those University athletes and athletic personnel authorized to access such facilities, and during their normal hours of operation. A valid University identification card is required to gain access.

Recreational facilities (spaces typically, but not solely designated for recreational activity not affiliated with intercollegiate athletic activity) are useable only by those individuals with a valid University student or faculty/staff/retiree identification card, programmed (where applicable) to allow proper access to such facilities, plus one related guest.  Access to such facilities will only be authorized during the time each facility is specifically designated as being open/available for use.

While open, these facilities shall have the appropriate staff on duty to oversee operations being conducted at that facility.

Any exceptions to this policy must be given in writing, and approved by the appropriate facilities office responsible for athletic and recreational facility access.

<end policy>

This policy, if I'm reading it correctly, would not have prevented Jerry Sandusky from abusing Matt Sandusky on PSU facilities.  Nor would it keep an abusive parent or uncle who is a University employee or retiree from bringing a child on campus and abusing them.

Part of the $6.5 million paid to Freeh supported the creation of this misguided policy.

The Two Person Rule

It is standard practice in most organizations and programs for youth to have a "two person rule" in  place to protect children and the adults who supervise them.

Here is a sample from Kid's World:

Two Person Rule
The "Two-Person" Rule is designed to protect both children and adults by not giving opportunities for adults to have sustained time alone with a child or student. It also protects staff and volunteers in situations in which a child or student with some significant emotional needs may misinterpret adult interaction or may make false statements about an adult's behavior toward them. By following this rule, many potential problem situations are prevented.

Simply put:

• The "Two-Person" rule must be in effect at all times during KidsWorld events.
• NEVER allow yourself or another volunteer to be alone with a child. This applies to children in your own family while serving in KidsWorld.
• At least one of the volunteers must be an adult.
• Volunteers must not be related. If they are related, a 3^rd volunteer must be present.

Each room will have a 2-way radio in their registration bin. Use it to contact a Zone Leader if you need a second volunteer to keep the Two-Person rule in effect.

Conclusion

Penn State policies are reviewed by the President's Council and the PSU General Counsel as part of the approval process.  It is clear that President Rodney Erickson and the other 17 members of the President's Council, as well as the PSU legal counsel haven't a clue about child abuse prevention.  Nearly 80% of child abuse is perpetrated by a parent.  Another 7% is perpetrated by a relative.  PSU still is under the impression that the danger is going to come from the creepy old man in a raincoat.

Nor do they have a clue about much else when it comes to running Penn State.