March4Truth and for the glory of Old State!
By
Ray Blehar
For more than six
decades, the Penn State fans would rise as one on fall Saturdays and cheer not
just for a football team, but for something that extended far beyond the end
lines of the football field.
When we
chanted, “We Are…Penn State,” it was not about football, but about an idea – a
belief. A belief in doing things the
right way and believing in something that was bigger than any one of us.
For more than six
decades, we were PENN STATE and we were unified with our pride in a school we referred to as Dear Old State.
But that is no longer
the case. Dear Old State does not exist except in the words of the alma mater. Instead, a bastardized version of Penn State has taken it place.
While we are still PENN STATE, and some resemblance of Dear Old State rises when we go inside the stadium
to cheer on Bill O’Brien’s Nittany Lions, that feeling ends shortly after the final
whistle blows.
And that whistle, ending that feeling, is merely the echo of a pre-mature whistle that was blown by the Penn
State University (PSU) Board of Trustees (BOT) on November 9, 2011.
On November 4, 2011, the
Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General (OAG) released a one sided,
prosecutorial document, known as a grand jury presentment that was an
indictment of not just Jerry Sandusky, but of PSU. And in the face of adversity, the PSU BOT didn’t
fight to the end, like those teams we watched for so many decades. Instead, they surrendered.
The lawyers on the BOT –
especially one who famously defended Merck in the Vioxx case -- didn’t even
bother to check the relevant laws in the presentment. They accepted the presentment’s lies as facts
and they allowed the University to be unfairly smeared by the press.
On November 9, 2011, the
BOT, led by John Surma, succumbed to media pressure and removed legendary coach
Joe Paterno and long-time President Graham Spanier from their positions,
without either man being allowed to speak in his own defense. On that day, the BOT declared PSU guilty of
all crimes and placed a black mark on the University – that if left to stand –
would stain PSU for the next fifty years.
In the ensuing eight
months, the BOT did nothing to defend PSU.
Instead, it worked with the NCAA and the firm of Freeh, Sporkin, and
Sullivan to cover for its own mistakes and place blame on PSU’s “football
culture.” When Louis Freeh provided his
(now discredited) report, the trustees praised
his work and used it to again condemn PSU.
Then they told everyone
to “move forward.”
It is clear, the PSU BOT
does not understand what it means to say, “We Are…Penn State.” They either don't know or have forgotten about "Dear Old State" and what that means to Penn Staters.
Penn Staters do not move forward when they
know that doing so keeps children in danger.
Penn Staters do not move forward when innocent people, especially
students, are punished for acts for which they were not responsible.
And Penn Staters will not move forward
without knowing the TRUTH.
Please join us for MARCH FOR TRUTH, Friday, September 20th, 330PM at the Penn Stater Hotel.
Details at March4Truth.com
Details at March4Truth.com
Another outstanding evaluation of a very inept BoT! To throw Penn State to the wind without a fight is unthinkable. To throw the football program under the bus without a fight was the most rediculus option that was ever agreed upon. I still feel that there are people on the B who would just as soon cancel football. The thing that really bothers me is that there is a group of T who are running the B without a clue as to what they are doing. There has not been one statement made that has convinced me that the Freeh report has changed anything that is making PSU any better than what it has always been to me. The sanctions against the football program was unsubstantiated and penalized players, past and present who had nothing to do with Sandusky, WHY? The continued rumors about what the B has planned for the future has me very concerned for the future of Penn State.
ReplyDeleteWhat?? They're not done?!? Maybe you guys need to be in front of whatever these rumored plans are. Explicitly confront and challenge the BoT BEFORE they enact other measures that may prove as difficult to undo as their actions surrounding Sandusky.
DeleteThere is not enough said in press regarding what I believe Franco said (I could not be there). He mentioned the fear people have in expressing their true feelings. I assume the people at the March were made of three primary things:
ReplyDelete1. courage
2. not employees
3. no chance or desire of ever doing business with the university
I'll be up for Michigan and looking to attend any activities planned.